Flow Architecture Analysis - Missing Cross-Flow Relationships
Analysis of whether flows need coalescing topics or if the current model is duplicative
Output
🎯 You're Right - Flows Need Deeper Relationships
The Problem I See in the Graph
Looking at your screenshots, I see the exact problem:
- Yellow nodes (flows) are isolated islands
- Green nodes (kontasks) only connect to their parent flow
- No edges between flows - no relationships showing how work connects
We created a hierarchical view, not a knowledge graph.
Current Data Model (What We Have)
Kontask ──evidence──▶ Flow
Kontask ──contains──▶ Flow
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐
│ Flow Graph Viz │ │ Edge Auto-Linking │
│ ┌──┐ ┌──┐ ┌──┐ │ │ ┌──┐ ┌──┐ ┌──┐ │
│ │k1│ │k2│ │k3│ │ │ │k4│ │k5│ │k6│ │
│ └──┘ └──┘ └──┘ │ │ └──┘ └──┘ └──┘ │
└─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘
(isolated) (isolated)
What's Missing (Coalescing Topics)
You're identifying that we need Topics as a level above Flows:
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ TOPIC: konui │
│ "Dashboard Console" │
└─────────────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────────┼──────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐
│ Flow: Graph │ │ Flow: Context │ │ Flow: Session │
│ Visualization │◀─│ Injection │─▶│ Management │
└───────────────┘ └───────────────┘ └───────────────┘
│ related_to │ │
└────────────┴───────depends_on───────┘
The 11 flows we created might actually be 3-4 topics:
- Dashboard Console - Graph viz, context injection, session management
- gvFlow System - Flow/decision design, edge linking, coalescing
- Platform Architecture - Docs, viewer design, schema
- Operations - Services health, data cleanup
Edge Stats Tell the Story
| Total Edges | 137 |
| Kontask→Flow (evidence) | 71 |
| Kontask→Flow (contains) | 66 |
| Flow→Flow relationships | 0 |
| Cross-kontask references | 0 |
Three Options Forward
Create gvTopic as a parent grouping for flows. Topics = coalescing categories.
- Pro: Clean hierarchy, flows can belong to multiple topics
- Con: Another entity to manage, more complexity
Use edge types like related_to, depends_on, supersedes between flows.
- Pro: Keeps current model, adds relationships
- Con: Flows still need to be linked manually (or by AI)
Merge related flows more aggressively. The 11 flows become 4 larger flows.
- Pro: Simpler, less entities to track
- Con: Loses granularity for specific work streams
💡 My Recommendation
Option B first - Add flow-to-flow edges. This tests whether relationships between flows provide the insight you're looking for.
If that still feels flat, then we'd know we need Option A (Topics as a true higher-level concept).
The key insight: Right now the graph shows containment (kontasks in flows) but not relationships (flows influencing each other).
Quick Actions
Original Request
No layout configured
Details
📋 Claude's Context
ses_793682af...
Raw Data
{
"id": "a873ffd8-4e35-4c3c-ae26-f0113f6ae000",
"type": "general",
"status": "completed",
"title": "Flow Architecture Analysis - Missing Cross-Flow Relationships",
"description": "Analysis of whether flows need coalescing topics or if the current model is duplicative",
"context": {
"output": "<div style=\"background:#1e1e1e;color:#e0e0e0;padding:20px;border-radius:8px;font-family:'Consolas','Monaco',monospace;\">\n<h2 style=\"font-family:sans-serif;color:#fff;margin:0 0 16px 0;\">🎯 You're Right - Flows Need Deeper Relationships</h2>\n\n<div style=\"background:#2d2d2d;padding:16px;border-radius:6px;margin-bottom:16px;\">\n<h3 style=\"color:#e5c07b;margin:0 0 12px 0;\">The Problem I See in the Graph</h3>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.6;\">Looking at your screenshots, I see the exact problem:</p>\n<ul style=\"line-height:1.8;\">\n<li><span style=\"color:#f97316;\">Yellow nodes</span> (flows) are isolated islands</li>\n<li><span style=\"color:#22c55e;\">Green nodes</span> (kontasks) only connect to their parent flow</li>\n<li><span style=\"color:#7f848e;\">No edges between flows</span> - no relationships showing how work connects</li>\n</ul>\n<p style=\"color:#e06c75;font-weight:bold;\">We created a hierarchical view, not a knowledge graph.</p>\n</div>\n\n<div style=\"background:#2d2d2d;padding:16px;border-radius:6px;margin-bottom:16px;\">\n<h3 style=\"color:#e5c07b;margin:0 0 12px 0;\">Current Data Model (What We Have)</h3>\n<pre style=\"background:#3d3d3d;padding:12px;border-radius:4px;overflow-x:auto;color:#98c379;\">\nKontask ──evidence──▶ Flow\nKontask ──contains──▶ Flow\n\n┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐\n│ Flow Graph Viz │ │ Edge Auto-Linking │\n│ ┌──┐ ┌──┐ ┌──┐ │ │ ┌──┐ ┌──┐ ┌──┐ │\n│ │k1│ │k2│ │k3│ │ │ │k4│ │k5│ │k6│ │\n│ └──┘ └──┘ └──┘ │ │ └──┘ └──┘ └──┘ │\n└─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘\n (isolated) (isolated)\n</pre>\n</div>\n\n<div style=\"background:#2d2d2d;padding:16px;border-radius:6px;margin-bottom:16px;\">\n<h3 style=\"color:#e5c07b;margin:0 0 12px 0;\">What's Missing (Coalescing Topics)</h3>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.6;\">You're identifying that we need <strong style=\"color:#61afef;\">Topics</strong> as a level above Flows:</p>\n\n<pre style=\"background:#3d3d3d;padding:12px;border-radius:4px;overflow-x:auto;color:#98c379;\">\n ┌─────────────────────────────┐\n │ TOPIC: konui │\n │ \"Dashboard Console\" │\n └─────────────────────────────┘\n │\n ┌──────────────────┼──────────────────┐\n ▼ ▼ ▼\n ┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐\n │ Flow: Graph │ │ Flow: Context │ │ Flow: Session │\n │ Visualization │◀─│ Injection │─▶│ Management │\n └───────────────┘ └───────────────┘ └───────────────┘\n │ related_to │ │\n └────────────┴───────depends_on───────┘\n</pre>\n\n<p style=\"line-height:1.6;\">The 11 flows we created might actually be <strong style=\"color:#c678dd;\">3-4 topics</strong>:</p>\n<ol style=\"line-height:1.8;\">\n<li><span style=\"color:#61afef;\">Dashboard Console</span> - Graph viz, context injection, session management</li>\n<li><span style=\"color:#61afef;\">gvFlow System</span> - Flow/decision design, edge linking, coalescing</li>\n<li><span style=\"color:#61afef;\">Platform Architecture</span> - Docs, viewer design, schema</li>\n<li><span style=\"color:#61afef;\">Operations</span> - Services health, data cleanup</li>\n</ol>\n</div>\n\n<div style=\"background:#2d2d2d;padding:16px;border-radius:6px;margin-bottom:16px;\">\n<h3 style=\"color:#e5c07b;margin:0 0 12px 0;\">Edge Stats Tell the Story</h3>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;\">\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #444;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;color:#7f848e;\">Total Edges</td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;color:#fff;font-weight:bold;\">137</td>\n</tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #444;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;color:#7f848e;\">Kontask→Flow (evidence)</td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;color:#98c379;\">71</td>\n</tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #444;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;color:#7f848e;\">Kontask→Flow (contains)</td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;color:#98c379;\">66</td>\n</tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #444;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;color:#e06c75;\">Flow→Flow relationships</td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;color:#e06c75;font-weight:bold;\">0</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;color:#e06c75;\">Cross-kontask references</td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;color:#e06c75;font-weight:bold;\">0</td>\n</tr>\n</table>\n</div>\n\n<div style=\"background:#2d2d2d;padding:16px;border-radius:6px;margin-bottom:16px;\">\n<h3 style=\"color:#e5c07b;margin:0 0 12px 0;\">Three Options Forward</h3>\n\n<div style=\"background:#3d3d3d;padding:12px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:12px;border-left:4px solid #22c55e;\">\n<strong style=\"color:#22c55e;\">Option A: Add Topic Layer</strong>\n<p style=\"color:#b0b0b0;margin:8px 0 0 0;\">Create gvTopic as a parent grouping for flows. Topics = coalescing categories.</p>\n<ul style=\"color:#a0a0a0;margin:4px 0;\">\n<li>Pro: Clean hierarchy, flows can belong to multiple topics</li>\n<li>Con: Another entity to manage, more complexity</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n\n<div style=\"background:#3d3d3d;padding:12px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:12px;border-left:4px solid #3b82f6;\">\n<strong style=\"color:#3b82f6;\">Option B: Add Flow→Flow Edges</strong>\n<p style=\"color:#b0b0b0;margin:8px 0 0 0;\">Use edge types like <code style=\"background:#4d4d4d;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;\">related_to</code>, <code style=\"background:#4d4d4d;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;\">depends_on</code>, <code style=\"background:#4d4d4d;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;\">supersedes</code> between flows.</p>\n<ul style=\"color:#a0a0a0;margin:4px 0;\">\n<li>Pro: Keeps current model, adds relationships</li>\n<li>Con: Flows still need to be linked manually (or by AI)</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n\n<div style=\"background:#3d3d3d;padding:12px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:12px;border-left:4px solid #8b5cf6;\">\n<strong style=\"color:#8b5cf6;\">Option C: Fewer Flows via Better Coalescing</strong>\n<p style=\"color:#b0b0b0;margin:8px 0 0 0;\">Merge related flows more aggressively. The 11 flows become 4 larger flows.</p>\n<ul style=\"color:#a0a0a0;margin:4px 0;\">\n<li>Pro: Simpler, less entities to track</li>\n<li>Con: Loses granularity for specific work streams</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n</div>\n\n<div style=\"background:#1a3a2a;padding:16px;border-radius:6px;border:1px solid #22c55e;\">\n<h3 style=\"color:#22c55e;margin:0 0 12px 0;\">💡 My Recommendation</h3>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.6;\"><strong>Option B first</strong> - Add flow-to-flow edges. This tests whether relationships between flows provide the insight you're looking for.</p>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.6;\">If that still feels flat, then we'd know we need <strong>Option A</strong> (Topics as a true higher-level concept).</p>\n<p style=\"color:#7f848e;margin-top:12px;\">The key insight: Right now the graph shows <em>containment</em> (kontasks in flows) but not <em>relationships</em> (flows influencing each other).</p>\n</div>\n</div>",
"requestedAt": "2026-01-10T02:20:00.000Z",
"requestId": "e2d479a7-2f8f-4bff-a637-73c98f2efc69",
"choices": [
{
"label": "Add Flow Edges",
"value": "Let's implement Option B - add flow-to-flow edge types (related_to, depends_on, supersedes) and update the graph visualization to show these relationships",
"primary": true
},
{
"label": "Create Topics",
"value": "Let's implement Option A - create a gvTopic entity as a parent grouping for flows, with the ability for flows to belong to multiple topics"
},
{
"label": "Merge Flows",
"value": "Let's do Option C - manually merge the 11 flows into 4 larger topic-level flows and update the coalescing logic"
},
{
"label": "Discuss More",
"value": "I want to discuss this further before deciding - let me explain my thoughts on what relationships we need"
}
],
"turnTiming": {
"totalMs": 84604,
"ttfeMs": 108,
"thinkingMs": 84494,
"toolExecutionMs": 0,
"toolCallCount": 0,
"thinkingPct": 100,
"toolsPct": 0,
"ttfePct": 0
}
},
"createdBy": "claude",
"createdAt": "2026-01-09T16:19:25.648Z",
"updatedAt": "2026-01-09T16:19:38.346Z",
"requestId": "e2d479a7-2f8f-4bff-a637-73c98f2efc69",
"scope": "vibetools",
"tags": [
"flows",
"architecture",
"kontasks"
],
"sessionId": "ses_793682af-433",
"flowId": "flow_01KEHFNV42KC3ZT34N4MJJFWXB",
"flowLinks": [
{
"flowId": "flow_01KEHFNV42KC3ZT34N4MJJFWXB",
"edgeType": "evidence",
"createdAt": "2026-01-09T16:19:25.648Z"
}
]
}